🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold forecast – not just the winner citywide, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

What was your night?

I had to do that because they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the tally frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but there were large groups of votes that came in after that and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world in which election day went somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which the opponent was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. However Mamdani added half a million votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president last year backed the progressive now. However it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I figured we might exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to get over half. He has just over 50% but there’s still probably 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus it’s not certain, but I think probable, and I hope he achieves it so afterwards no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Including one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly surprised me. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added many Republicans on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I think occurred a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened prior to Trump endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for the candidate dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and homeowners supported Cuomo. Thus there was a little resistance. But no, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran won – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on if the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. And also, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if existed major surprises on this one, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – candidates will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I think that each urban center in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.